Join Us!

HR6490 PAL

HELP END MEDICARE FRAUD

Read AMEPA's ideas to combat fraud NOW

AMEPA Fraud Prevention Plan

If you suspect a Medicare fraud ...

Report Here

Become a Member

Become a member today and support our national efforts for an adequate resolution of the DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program. Click here more details on the benefits of the AMEPA membership.

AMEPA Membership Application

Donwload and fill our membership application here.

icon Member Application

icon AMEPA Associate - Sponsor Application

 
 
Home Latest News 06/27/12 - Senate and Congressional leaders request GAO study on Audit Contractors
06/27/12 - Senate and Congressional leaders request GAO study on Audit Contractors PDF Print E-mail
Amepa News
Written by Rob Brant   

Yesterday, the leadership of the Senate Finance, Energy and Commerce, and Ways and Means Subcommittee on Oversight sent a bi-partisan letter to the Comptroller of the Government Accountability Office requesting a report on the activities, methods and coordination of MAC, RAC, ZPIC and CERT audit contractors.

The Senate Finance Committee were sent many questions from AMEPA members and other stakeholders in response to a request for audit feedback from the healthcare industry in the form of white papers.

The Senators and Representatives asked the GAO to evaluate the following questions:

What process does CMS use to determine whether the contractors' audit criteria and methodologies are valid, clear and consistent? 

How does CMS coordinate among these contractors to ensure that their interactions with providers are not duplicative? Is there any evidence of providers being subjected to multiple overlapping audits on the same topic? If so, how frequently does this occur? Isthere any justification for a single provider being audited by multiple contractors at the same time?

What are the reasons for requesting that similar information be submitted to multiple contractors? Are there steps CMS is taking to limit duplicative audits, while still ensuring contractors have the tools necessary to pursue program integrity efforts?

Does CMS have a strategic plan to coordinate and oversee all of its audit activities and, if so, how is that plan implemented and overseen?

The letter was signed by the following legislators:

Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) Chair of the Senate Finance Committee

Senator Orin Hatch (R-UT) Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee

Senator Tom Coburn, M.D. (R-OK) Ranking Member of the Senate Finance, Subcommittee on Social Security, Pension & Family Policy

Senator Tom Carper (D-DE) Deputy Whip, Member of the Senate Finance Committee

Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) Ranking Member of the Senate Finance, Subcommittee on Health

Representative Fred Upton (R-MI ) Chair of the Energy & Commerce Committee

Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) Ranking Member of the Energy & Commerce Committee

Representative Cliff Sterns (R-FL) Chair of the Energy & Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations

Representative Diana DeGette (D-CO) Ranking Member of the Energy & Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations

Representative Charles Boustany, M.D. (R-LA) Chair of the Ways & Means, Oversight Subcommittee

Representative John Lewis (D-GA) Ranking Member of the Ways & Means, Oversight Subcommittee

A copy of the letter is accessible below

  

Want to learn more about AMEPA and our advocacy efforts?

Then for only $25 per month, help the cause.           

 

AMEPA has replaced our annual membership with a Post-Bid Fundraising request: $150 for the next 6 months.

 

Help keep AMEPA and the DME industry's only Patient Advocacy Line (PAL) going.

   

Click Here to keep AMEPA and the PAL going

 

Hits: 1378
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
Copyright © 2013 Accredited Medical Equipment Providers of America. All Rights Reserved.
Site by trapezoid
blast-legionary
blast-legionary
blast-legionary
blast-legionary
closed-execution
closed-execution
closed-execution
closed-execution